Ve Court TV Legendary Trials con Fubo
Pueden aplicarse impuestos, cargos adicionales y restricciones regionales.
See the trials that captivated the world and made history! Join your favorite Court TV hosts, Vinnie Politan, Julie Grant, Michael Ayala, Ted Rowlands and Ashley Willcott, and witness all the dramatic moments streaming on Court TV Legendary Trials.
Mistress & Child Murder Trial
S1, EP24 "FBI Agent Under Voir Dire"An FBI Special Agent Andrew Masters is testifying on the methodology he uses to analyze the cellular activity of the defendant and his mistress leading up to the two fatal stabbings.
Mistress & Child Murder Trial
S1, EP25 "Questioning the Expert's Methodology"The FBI cell phone analyst testifies the defendant's GPS location was at the vicinity of the double murders; both sides in the courtroom debate the methodology and analysis of cellphone activity.
Mistress & Child Murder Trial
S1, EP26 "Battle Of The Experts"The defense brings in their own cellphone analyst to debunk the report done by the state's expert.
Mistress & Child Murder Trial
S1, EP27 "Judge Makes His Ruling"Judge Joe Lopez makes his ruling allowing the state to bring in their FBI cell phone analyst to testify to the jury; Special Agent Andrew Masters' report in this case, with base on GPS technology, puts the defendant at the crime scene.
Mistress & Child Murder Trial
S1, EP28 "Andrew Masters"Andrew Masters claims to have incontrovertible proof that Ronald Burgos-Aviles was at that park the morning leading up to the fatal stabbings of his mistress and their son.
Mistress & Child Murder Trial
S1, EP29 "Cell Phone Data Info Displayed"The jury gets a lecture of cellphone data extraction and analysis; on the stand, FBI Special Agent Andrew Masters does a report in this case concluding the whereabouts of Ronald Burgos-Aviles.
Mistress & Child Murder Trial
S1, EP30 "Challenging the Cell Phone Analyst"Cross-examination begins on the State's FBI cell phone analyst; the Defense tries to keep cellphone data out of the courtroom for jurors to hear.
Mistress & Child Murder Trial
S1, EP31 "On Duty Incident"Prosecutors call in an internal affairs officer at the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol Protection; at the time of the stabbings, the defendant was a Border Patrol supervisor in charge of the area where the murders took place.
Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial
S1, EP15 "I Hit Him"Prosecutors call a firefighter to testify and focus on what was happening after John O'Keefe was found and how the paramedics responded.
Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial
S1, EP16 "Katie Mclaughlin Under Fire"Karen Read's defense accuses Katie McLaughlin of changing her story about what happened and what she heard regarding the death of John O'Keefe; the Defense zeroes in on social media posts and a friendship that McLaughlin allegedly had.
Accomplice to Murder, With Vinnie Politan
S1, EP5 "SC v. Poole"After her husband Brent was murdered, Renée Poole's multiple affairs and secret life as a stripper makes her the main suspect in his death.
Accomplice to Murder, With Vinnie Politan
S1, EP6 "OH v. Jenkins"Tonica Jenkins has a talent for manipulating people to get what she wanted.
Judgment With Ashleigh Banfield
S1, EP44 "Michigan v. Schmitz"Scott Amendure thought the "Jenny Jones Show" was the perfect place to reveal to his friend Jonathan Schmitz that he had a crush on him; three days later, Schmitz shot Amendure to death.
Judgment With Ashleigh Banfield
S1, EP45 "Michigan v. Kevorkian"Dr. Jack Kevorkian thought it was an act of mercy to help over 130 terminally ill patients die a peaceful, pain-free death; Michigan prosecutors said it was murder and spent years trying to get a jury to agree with them.
Mistress & Child Murder Trial
S1, EP25 "Questioning the Expert's Methodology"The FBI cell phone analyst testifies the defendant's GPS location was at the vicinity of the double murders; both sides in the courtroom debate the methodology and analysis of cellphone activity.
Mistress & Child Murder Trial
S1, EP26 "Battle Of The Experts"The defense brings in their own cellphone analyst to debunk the report done by the state's expert.